SheridanCat (talk | contribs) (Discussion about startyourbankroll.com link) |
m (Talk:Bankroll Management moved to Talk:Bankroll management) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the startyourbankroll.com link should be removed. This is basically an affiliate recruitment site. If we aren't careful, we'll fill with affiliate spam. Any thoughts? [[User:SheridanCat|SheridanCat]] 23:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
I think the startyourbankroll.com link should be removed. This is basically an affiliate recruitment site. If we aren't careful, we'll fill with affiliate spam. Any thoughts? [[User:SheridanCat|SheridanCat]] 23:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :I tend to agree. I honestly had only clicked through very briefly, but my only reasons for tolerating it were to avoid giving the impressions of heavy-handedness. If there's any content on there that's relevant to the topic then I could tolerate it (until we get so many sites that we're having to pare them down based on quality) but just calling your site "Start Your Bankroll" doesn't impute relevance. My vote is to remove it if it's not relevant. - [[User:PhilipR|PhilipR]] 02:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 14:37, 27 January 2009
I think the startyourbankroll.com link should be removed. This is basically an affiliate recruitment site. If we aren't careful, we'll fill with affiliate spam. Any thoughts? SheridanCat 23:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I tend to agree. I honestly had only clicked through very briefly, but my only reasons for tolerating it were to avoid giving the impressions of heavy-handedness. If there's any content on there that's relevant to the topic then I could tolerate it (until we get so many sites that we're having to pare them down based on quality) but just calling your site "Start Your Bankroll" doesn't impute relevance. My vote is to remove it if it's not relevant. - PhilipR 02:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)